InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

VuBru

08/06/17 7:32 PM

#111629 RE: rafunrafun #111628

Fits with their statement at 60% IA that "we are continuing to give the trial time for results to become more robust" (paraphrased). But, that is a W..A.. theory ;-)
icon url

oneragman

08/06/17 8:00 PM

#111630 RE: rafunrafun #111628

Raf,
There is a lot out there, but my 1st question would be why is everyone blinded but the company?
icon url

rosemountbomber

08/06/17 8:17 PM

#111632 RE: rafunrafun #111628

Would Amarin not have been compelled to inform everyone that the DMC came out with the first stop recommendation under your scenario? One would think that would be a material event.
icon url

FlyFishingStocks

08/06/17 8:38 PM

#111634 RE: rafunrafun #111628

Raf, great thought, but do you think Kennedy would have filed to sell all his shares if your theory was valid?
icon url

HDGabor

08/06/17 8:53 PM

#111637 RE: rafunrafun #111628

r-

Before we see a tons of post re. this ... (I really do not know how to call it ...): in this case the study should not be blinded (since nothing is exist to hide) and AMRN could start the sNDA process (label change) based on 60% data ... but they did not want it, since

Eh they would only gain an extra year of sales before patents expire. What are we talking about, only a couple of billion dollars per year, maybe more... yep, no big deal, who cares, its only money.

EOS

Best,
G