VERY IMPORTANT information! Shouldn't we be watching SFOR's response to this prior to the stated deadline? Major reason why (per definition via Cornell Law)...
Motion to Dismiss. Formal request for a court to dismiss a case. Reasons for dismissal vary. Examples include a settlement between the parties, voluntary withdrawal of the complaint, and procedural defects such as a lack of jurisdiction or a failure to state a claim.
So if SFOR's lawyer agrees in their response, then it is very likely a motion to dismiss (in this case) is based on reaching a settlement. If SFOR's lawyer responds in a defensive manor, then SFOR might not get its way and it could signal longer litigation (hopefully, not a dismissal in favor of the defendant).
Just putting this out there...I think the response to this will be key.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
