InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2057
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/25/2012

Re: mrdrifter post# 173992

Wednesday, 07/26/2017 8:36:24 AM

Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:36:24 AM

Post# of 235061
VERY IMPORTANT information! Shouldn't we be watching SFOR's response to this prior to the stated deadline? Major reason why (per definition via Cornell Law)...

Motion to Dismiss. Formal request for a court to dismiss a case. Reasons for dismissal vary. Examples include a settlement between the parties, voluntary withdrawal of the complaint, and procedural defects such as a lack of jurisdiction or a failure to state a claim.

So if SFOR's lawyer agrees in their response, then it is very likely a motion to dismiss (in this case) is based on reaching a settlement. If SFOR's lawyer responds in a defensive manor, then SFOR might not get its way and it could signal longer litigation (hopefully, not a dismissal in favor of the defendant).

Just putting this out there...I think the response to this will be key.