You stated;"I have asked about 5. IR told me that is is in arb and can't discuss much. I think it is better that way; every communication goes through the arb and their lawyer. They opened their mouth on what they expect Nok and Samsung to pay, and see what happen."
Idcc management has been accused of illegal behavior and neither they nor the company can afford the luxury of waiting a year to respond to the charges.
"As far as number 4, it is a non-issue. They have discussed it the recent CC; just part of the licensing negitiation delaying technigue. Don't let the short here scare you on this issue."
If it was a non-issue management would not have felt obligated to report the event to shareholders as being material! Now you are claiming it isn't material?
Additionally, this speaks volumes about the strength (or lack thereof) of IDCC's CDMA IPR. Who in their right mind would take responsibility for any infringement of IDCC's IPR if IDCC really had a good case that their IPR was essential? Successful investors do not stick their head in the sand when it comes to such important clues.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
