Replies to post #28049 on Intellipharmaceutics International Inc. (IPCI)

[doogdilinger]

That author was also touting ELTP in that article...so of course he has zero proof/facts to support such an asinine claim that some scientist supposedly provided him with a statement that IPCI's chemistry/science is a problem...if it was then the FDA wouldn't have granted them a PDUFA date on Rexista would they lol

[Despicable_Z]

I arrived at largely the same conclusions that you did Fred. Personally I feel the author is unfairly and disparagingly biased against IPCI and the his "reasoning" leaves much to be desired. Later he goes on to state he doesn't trust the company because it is a husband and wife operation- given his largely logical approach to the rest of his analysis this seems out of character and unfair to IPCI given what they have going for them. In addition, IPCI's technology has yet to fail them in any endeavor- you can't say the same thing about their competitors. I feel the author had financial reasons to avoid mentioning IPCI and shouldn't be considered a good source of information. Just my .02

[mopar44o]

Author’s reply » Philip Mause, thanks for the question about IPCI. I am aware of them. My reservations stem from a statement by a scientist about the chemistry/science being a problem and my own business concerns about management. I will leave it there."

That fact he is quoting some mysterious scientist with no sources, and doesn't elaborate on his concerns of management tells me he's full of jack and s***, and jack left town.