InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kscott74

05/26/17 1:27 PM

#166258 RE: B RY #166256

Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but the patent that ACS has agreed to buy is not among the ones being (allegedly) infringed. So why would there be any litigation hold on that patent if it's not being directly contested in any of the current suits?
icon url

Lolaspike

05/26/17 1:31 PM

#166261 RE: B RY #166256

Interesting...thank you.
icon url

splithappens

05/26/17 2:55 PM

#166275 RE: B RY #166256

The purchase agreement has nothing to do with the OOBA (COBAS) lawsuits. If this is what you are referring to.

The ASC deal is for the MT and GID patents only. There may be possible infringers as listed at the bottom of the APA.

Kay made it clear that ASC will most likely (I'm not sure why) pay prior to the 2020 date.

IMO

GLTA
icon url

Diego1235

05/26/17 3:14 PM

#166277 RE: B RY #166256

You need to clear your DD... ProtecID patent is not for sell and that one is OOBA and that one is the one we are fighting in court and that one is the one that worth billions $.