InvestorsHub Logo

jpike

05/25/17 1:04 PM

#166061 RE: sissyjane1 #166059

Not that much posted here about the specifics of what the damages will consist. Each defendant's damages may have a different make up. Very hard to put a handle on specific monetary awards. Size of company, longevity of infringement and so many things figure into SFOR's awards. Nice problem for SFOR to have: figuring damages!! Must be necessary experts fees to testify to damages. I always wondered if retainers fee might cover "costs of experts" in obtaining their vital opinions and testimony to prove damages.

moneym8ker

05/25/17 1:08 PM

#166062 RE: sissyjane1 #166059

No...Jane...
The question that should be on everyone's lips and at everyone's finger tips should be this:

"Mark Kay, you've stated in a variety of ways that SFOR's Q1 and Q2 will not be anything special. You've gone further on to say, using various media, that the 2nd half of 2017 will be great. Q2 is almost over. Where is some press that'll offer further insight into the second half of 2017?


"Mr. Kay, in years past, you've established a track record of, well, lies. In years past, as recent as 2016, you've made claims that next quarter, or next year, big deals will be signed yet revenue is spotty or even declines substantially when compared to the previous quarters. Why should investors trust you this time?"


If you are playing SFOR based on what Mark Kay has said, then you have to also play SFOR based off of what Mark Kay has actually done.

16 years he's been the CEO of SFOR. He's walked investors through more than a handful of reverse splits and he's been at the helm for dozens of dilutive financing deals.
You just can't have it both ways folks.


Either have a casual relationship... a FWB if you will with the stock, or Marry Kay and Sfor. Own what he says he'll do...and also own what he's said he would do but didn't do.

SFOR is a catalyst play. Mark Kay sleeps between catalysts...he's old.. it's what old people with no more zeal for the game do.

YOU CANT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!

Marry the stock and own their history...accept that history repeats itself...
Or just have a FWB relationship with SFOR.

Your choice.


No matter what... anyone owning stock in SFOR should be calling Kay and screaming "WHAT THE EFF MAN?!? You said the same things in early 2016 and your 10K says you FREAKING lied!?!?... please freaking tell me that you're not lying this time too!"