Replies to post #166794 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[lastchoice]

ANYBODY that files a public record is open to having the filing analyzed. the filer, the file and hypotheses about agendas are public matters. how can you deny that the filer is part and parcel of the file? nobody made you come here to solicit support. correct me if i'm wrong, didn't you tell us that you filed the motion?

i'm extrapolating that the only possible TOS violation would be cross referencing your real name to your ID. you filed the action, and asked questions at the ASMs. therefore, you are subject to discussion. Mr. M. C. is a legitimate matter for discussion. the cross reference to your ID may not be.

Mr. M. C. filed a matter of record, and asked questions in a public forum. that person needs to be discussed. how would anybody know he equated to one Corp_buyer. is corp. buying your vocation?

DEFAMED, pp. Slandered; dishonored or injured by evil reports. what evil reports?

de·fame (d-fm)
tr.v. de·famed, de·fam·ing, de·fames
1. To damage the reputation, character, or good name of by slander or libel. See Synonyms at malign.
2. Archaic To disgrace.

again, slander or libel, require false and malicious

[arthritis65]

well then idcc mgmt has every right to sue you for your statements about them

[revlis]

corp,

It should be since you use this board as an extension of your employment.

mo

[laranger]

Corp.

Do you ever shut up?

[FlyNavy]

Michael! you are very close to losing your mind. btw your firm is nothing but a reflection of your actions. If I were one of your firms clients and read your post on this board I would have some major concerns about continuing in a business relationship.

[dndodd]

Talk about a violation of TOS.

You use this board to push your agenda like a used car salesman.

[alalud]

Corp Buyer, your predictions and prognostications have finally begun to come true. Come back and enjoy the ride. You certain were right 3-4 years ago, even if you were panned by many of the posters. Would love to hear your take on where we are now, and what the future holds. Anyone have any idea where the Technical Advisor plays into todays news?

[TFWG]

Nice, mikey is back again. I was at the meeting where mikey tried in vane to convince us shareholders to support his proposal. What a sad little effort that was.