InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dell_Griffith

05/11/17 11:30 AM

#116997 RE: DMN #116990

Companies usually try to find a way to work together or ignore patents that really don't affect their bottom line.



And that's, that. Apple was down this road already with "Liquidmorphium." Apple had the name in their cross-hairs and started to pursue it.

They either agreed the name could be used or they stopped using it. They reached some kind of agreement. The proof is public and it's out there.

Oh well, back to being bored until Apple either announces the impossible at the end of May, or Open House or Q3. I've kind of lost interest in the Open House, though. Making money and moving the price is all that matters.
icon url

rige

05/11/17 12:01 PM

#117006 RE: DMN #116990

If i can add to that, In certain situations it does not benefit a company from defending a particular Patent in court IF there is a chance they would lose the trial and so lose claims over those patent rights, which would then Invite further infringement of other related Patents and by many other companies.

I don't fancy Apple's chances of getting a favourable ruling in China against Eontec and Professor Li.
Eontec and Prof. Li are Apple's best IP rights defenders in China.