InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

0nceinalifetime

08/10/03 12:06 PM

#40509 RE: mschere #40504

My comments below:

"I would welcome any input from any Qualcomm "cultists" or even IDCC "bashers" regarding the difference between EV-DV and EV-DO..and how either version will impact IDCC financially?"

I don't know why you would actively solicit the input of IDCC "bashers" regarding anything. It's been my experience that bashers don't contibute anything useful. I just don't know why you would ask for their input.

As for Qualcomm "cultists", are there any left? I'm always surprised at how many IDCC "cultists" their still are but where are the Qualcomm "cultists"? I hope you are not speaking of such highly regarded participants as Rich Bloem?

As to the value of Tantivy's IPR which was recently acquired by IDCC, well, I would say IDCC thought it was worth more than $10 million to them and Tantivy thought it was worth less than $10 million to them or they wouldn't have sold it for $10 million.

But the above assumes IDCC management was acting responsibly and not just purchasing Tantivity for more selfish reasons because, as we all know, management did not have to deplete their personal funds to purchase Tantivy.

Once


icon url

Data_Rox

08/11/03 8:05 AM

#40556 RE: mschere #40504

mschere re: difference between EV-DV and EV-DO

Here's a pretty good post on the topic

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=993306