InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 762
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

Re: mschere post# 40504

Sunday, 08/10/2003 12:06:41 PM

Sunday, August 10, 2003 12:06:41 PM

Post# of 432659
My comments below:

"I would welcome any input from any Qualcomm "cultists" or even IDCC "bashers" regarding the difference between EV-DV and EV-DO..and how either version will impact IDCC financially?"

I don't know why you would actively solicit the input of IDCC "bashers" regarding anything. It's been my experience that bashers don't contibute anything useful. I just don't know why you would ask for their input.

As for Qualcomm "cultists", are there any left? I'm always surprised at how many IDCC "cultists" their still are but where are the Qualcomm "cultists"? I hope you are not speaking of such highly regarded participants as Rich Bloem?

As to the value of Tantivy's IPR which was recently acquired by IDCC, well, I would say IDCC thought it was worth more than $10 million to them and Tantivy thought it was worth less than $10 million to them or they wouldn't have sold it for $10 million.

But the above assumes IDCC management was acting responsibly and not just purchasing Tantivity for more selfish reasons because, as we all know, management did not have to deplete their personal funds to purchase Tantivy.

Once



The best way to convince a fool that he is wrong is to let him have his own way.

~ ~ ~ Josh Billings

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News