Replies to post #3169 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Rurouni Kenshin]

My point to staw5 in regards to the PR, until other companies comes up & make it public then DNAP is the only one with the capablities at this time. DNAP is being quite objective here.

The PR is not misleading, just depends how you want to comprehend it & I am not stating straw5 is incorrect either.

"IF" another company can do what DNAP do then it would be PUBLIC, in this case it is not.

[frogdreaming]

Re 'hedge phrase' argument.

Straw5 is arguably the best poster on this board.

regards
frog

[worktoplay]

Straw5...

If you read my original post to Mahastock I also acknowledged that the evidence I have seen so far strongly favors a direct relationship between DNAP and DNA Phenomics ("strongly favors"--another hedge phrase; meaning that I haven't yet seen the proof).

And what would you call the fact that DNAP's Website banner, an aerial photo of Sarasota, and DNAPrint Asia-Pacific images were in DNA Phenomics website image files, if not proof of association? Just a bizarre coincidence? lol

Sometimes very good due diligence may uncover relationships that the parties didn't intend to be discovered, yet. If, as you seem to be suggesting, we should all wait for a definitive statement on the part of the companies before acting, one will miss opportunities to invest before the knowledge of the association drives the price up.

If I were inclined to do that, I could save a lot of time if I quit digging around for information, and just wait for the company PR's. Of course by that time I may also have missed a great buying opportunity.

Later,
W2P