Friday, August 08, 2003 2:04:40 PM
Of course they cannot prove it (and that is why, incidently, that the PR contained hedge words); and therefore the PR is not the proof it was offered as. That was my point in a nutshell. End of story. We can move on.
Maybe DNAP are the only ones. If not they are certainly at the head of the pack.
If you read my original post to Mahastock I also acknowledged that the evidence I have seen so far strongly favors a direct relationship between DNAP and DNA Phenomics ("strongly favors"--another hedge phrase; meaning that I haven't yet seen the proof).
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM