InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 87
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: winbig911_ post# 3168

Friday, 08/08/2003 2:04:40 PM

Friday, August 08, 2003 2:04:40 PM

Post# of 82595
My point was that last night mahastock posted the DNAP news release and bolded portions of sentences out of context that if read "as bolded" said that DNAP was, in fact, the only company in the world that offered these services. I responded by pointing out that he left key parts of the sentences out (unbolded) that drastically changed the proof of certainty regarding the issue at hand. Rourouni (sp?) then gave some ludicrous (no offense intended) interpretation of what "to their knowledge" and "DNAP believes" meant and I responded to that post.

Of course they cannot prove it (and that is why, incidently, that the PR contained hedge words); and therefore the PR is not the proof it was offered as. That was my point in a nutshell. End of story. We can move on.

Maybe DNAP are the only ones. If not they are certainly at the head of the pack.

If you read my original post to Mahastock I also acknowledged that the evidence I have seen so far strongly favors a direct relationship between DNAP and DNA Phenomics ("strongly favors"--another hedge phrase; meaning that I haven't yet seen the proof).