Replies to post #3172 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Miss Scarlet]

OK Folks, that horse is DEAD! We all thoroughly understand your respective takes. Now please quit wasting your posts on beating this dead horse and get back to your corners! LOL

[Straw5]

Rurouni--my last comment on this (I hope--I only have 14 left for the day, lol).

I never implied or said that the PR was misleading. They (PRs) always contain hedge phrases when making sweeping statements such as DNAP did. I, as well as you, and I am sure most of us here understand why, and the implications of such statements...regardless of how confident DNAP are off the record.

I was specifically commenting on selectively taking parts of the NR out of context and presenting them as proof to this board, where no proof existed.

Are we square?