Replies to post #36864 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[ksviking12]

Agreed. As I said the fees should all be in play. The business was not affected as there was no business and continues to be no business. Unless there are documented instances where TAUG had deals in place for fundraising that fell through there's nothing to discuss here. The only fundraising chat was ever available was highly dilutive as AGAIN, TAUG had no products or business. Good luck convincing a judge or jury that a shell was damaged to the tune of 7 figures. The potential was just so high if only we were current in our filings, because we were always just so hopeful that we would have an actual product. We know we never have had one or have anyone who has ever built a brand or managed a product but trust us, we would have done it.

[ksviking12]

Why no add up all the delinquencies and then look at the money raised before TAUG had to delist. Add it all up and then maybe you have a number to look at for a ruling. Reality is that you can expect 75% of that or less. So instead of all of this back and forth why not do real analysis and try to come up with a settlement projection that means something? Otherwise, this is simply a distraction from the comical new product. No amount of connections in distribution will affect the consumer pull on that dog shit product. The notion that a jnj employee would stick their neck out for a penny stock company is ludicrous. Common sense and conventional wisdom has to set in to even the most optimistic and invested here.

[Johnny_C]

Let's not forget punitive damages. .....