There ARE MANY TYPES OF POTENTIAL DAMAGES
and your assessment is incorrect on many levels
A stock that loses its liquidity and loses its ability to raise capital based on Rule 144
or a company that is subject to severe default penalties (with respect to outstanding notes) and conversion prices because of delinquency in SEC Filing Status
Has suffered significant damage
Imagine this -- If Cowan had been honest and notified Tauriga about the malpractice (back in late 2014 when PCAOB was investigating this very issue -- see Meyler's Deposition)
Then Tauriga could have taken steps to prevent what occurred
Tauriga should not have been in the position in which it found out about the malpractice from the July 23, 2015 PCAOB Censure -- Cowan chose to conceal this info from Tauriga but had no problem sending invoices
Tauriga entered into 2 Notes, for example, without having any inkling that there was imminent danger of delinquency and inability to rely on FY 2014 Financial Statement audit that the Company spent more than $150,000 on
Cowan created this mess by being greedy and dishonest. In your eyes, there are no consequences for that??? That's pretty sad
