InvestorsHub Logo

seifer1975

01/22/17 7:50 PM

#36617 RE: plutoniumimplosion #36616

I thought it was to visit with CVS.

Berman meeting with CVS, that's funny. And BS. Maybe Berman shouldn't have picked a fight with TAUG or insult someone worth 100 times his market cap.
CVS, right. They wouldn't do business with Berman

seifer1975

01/23/17 8:11 AM

#36623 RE: plutoniumimplosion #36616

"And then I received this citation in my email from another poster. Are we looking at another "bring it on" moment? '

What is the relevance of that citation? I thought Berman tried to bribe TAUG's CEO with Decn shares to get a merger done?

Is it being implied now that Berman tried to extort the Taug CEO or shareholders Do you have any proof that Berman was involved in an extortion plot or are you just posting random laws?

seifer1975

01/23/17 8:11 AM

#36624 RE: plutoniumimplosion #36616

or to prohibit any person from carrying out a duty imposed by law,

Why don't CEO's carry out the fiduciary responsibilities that are required by law? for instance, failing to inform investors of material events!