InvestorsHub Logo

Darth Trader

11/27/16 9:48 AM

#45979 RE: pantherj #45977

I think the term "amicably settled" applies here. With the leverage MW had your kidding yourself to think he'd leave the fed case alone. What I think happened, the dullards served the fed case judgement up on a platter rather than have their heads on it.

The state case file is loaded with evidence and I know 100% MW was going to use the dullards illegal actions against them in court. Their depositions crucified them. "I don't know, didn't know" ain't a legal excuse.

The fact is its over. Ifus/mw owes nothing. That's verifiable.

As asked before, please answer the 3 questions I asked before.

PEACHMAN

11/27/16 10:07 AM

#45983 RE: pantherj #45977

Oh, good grief.Completely inaccurate. The "Large amount of damages" one shareholder spoke of are the result of the damages in the state case that Energy Supreme could have been responsible for had they not settled... Read the Broward county records..

It specifically talks about the business plan and anticipated revenues the first three years..That business plan is exactly why an outside individual loaned the company 250,000...

Finally it doesn't matter..

IFUS WILL continue to sell more bagasse and build the company

IFUS STRONG