bigon,
absolutely right. SK said they're seeing evidence of an adaptive response.
(and the single dose data proved it conclusively).
- which should really be no surprise, since the PS is blocked,which is now understood to be the fundamental point - "square one" in terms of successful evasion of the immune system, which happens to be THE common mechanism exploited by cancer, virus, malaria, and many other pathogens.
Going after various antigens that show up in the tumor envoironment, or going after growth factors etc, etc, are all 'farther downstream', and, as effective as some strategies may be, they are not dealing with the most fundamental and pervasive factor that saps the strength of the immune system- exposed PS.
By changing that fundamental and earliest of events in the pathogenesis of all the above mentioned diseases and disease states, the INNATE response is "allowed" to really do its thing, and the adaptive response follows right along behind it.
That's how it works for most things, - except in the apoptosis pathway, which again- is what all these diseases have been hiding behind.
My only issue with all this bavi stuff all along has been, "is it safe?". (because it simply HAS to work, it really can't NOT stick to PS, thereby changing the immune response). For me safety was the issue all along, and it's looking very very good.
it makes perfect sense to be safe too, anyway.
j
PS- I like how you threw in that Gates name..