I agree that the viral loads are skewed to the up side. I think that the company reported these results with that purpose in mind. I would think that several experiments got run in order to determine how long they could delay treatment and still save a certain percentage of the pigs. It could be that by starting treatment sooner, they ended up with a cure rate of 100%. While this would of made for a great PR, I don’t see how that really translates to the HCV trial.