InvestorsHub Logo

StockMedic1

10/08/16 9:40 AM

#30627 RE: colmar #30620

The company didn't pay any fee's to its investment banker. Thats a talking point that has been put forth since the beginning to try to discredit the company by making it appear that they have to pay to play and that no legitimate banker would give them the time of day. I urged the company to release their 3 contracts publicly, but they said they were not allowed to under the terms of their agreements other than to disclose and outline the agreements in the Q during which they contracted with them. This fallacy that they have to pay to play is typical OTC banter, but thats not the case here. If some of you didn't abuse the privilege of calling and emailing Lorraine so much, she may have explained it in more detail to you. Now, we all have to wait for the next update, Q or 8K.

Penny Stocks 2.0

10/08/16 9:47 AM

#30632 RE: colmar #30620

Here's,what I see, Naked Shorts are in trouble, bad days ahead.

Penny Stocks 2.0

10/08/16 9:48 AM

#30633 RE: colmar #30620

Ha-ha, yah ok...cute rendition of something none of us are privy to. YET.