Slick. Forget the " failed to show benefit " idea . If that was the case they would have stopped the trial and all of Zumantu's posts would also have been fabricated .
Not the case EPA shows benefit ...the question is ..how much .
Agree on being open to interpretation, but my assumption was that if it was the negative case, the volume and price would be decreasing. Clearly not the case. Regardless, I love these Rorschach tests in the absence of info. I should point out that every major price move in past few months has been driven by something real that we were at least initially unaware of. Just saying...