InvestorsHub Logo

bradford86

09/05/16 12:37 PM

#351730 RE: big-yank #351713

you probably aren't interested in reviewinng the motion to compel:
http://www.gselinks.com/Court_Filings/Fairholme/13-465-0297.pdf

or the fact that judge sweeney has now released several batches of documents not just to plaintiff lawyers but to the public



you say:
"
1. The documents are legally protectable under all manner of reasons and will NEVER be released by Judge Sweeney.

2. The documents contain matters of absolute national security.
"

you're entitled to your opinion. you've been right so far but judge sweeney hasn't ruled on the motion to compel yet

you're suggesting that the government's assertions of privilege over 11,292 documents is fair and legal

based on what we've seen so far, i disagree; now, if you were to rewind 2 years you might be more believable

Stockman1010101

09/06/16 1:32 AM

#351765 RE: big-yank #351713

Totally wrong. The government hidden documents have zero national security content, they have 100% content to incriminate and prove that the government acted illegally and unlawfully in 2008 and the entire conservatorship was a scam to ripoff the GSEs and their shareholders. These documents will reveal this to be the truth. All your distorted ideas have zero value, and zero logical conclusions. These documents will be released by Judge Sweeney in the coming days and hopefully once and for all this act alone will mute your upside down and twisted view of the entire GSE affairs to date.