The fact that Piszel was ruled as having no valid takings claim is a precedent for a similar view in other pending cases. I still maintain that this was the best course by which plaintiffs in the Perry proceeding could make inroads in the government's position, and now that appears to be unlikely based on the this and the earlier Lamberth ruling.
Awaiting Delaware amended complaint details. Should be very interesting and could be a gamechanger if my suspicions are validated.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
