InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 5082
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2012

Re: yambike post# 350160

Friday, 08/19/2016 11:13:09 AM

Friday, August 19, 2016 11:13:09 AM

Post# of 796103
The fact that Piszel was ruled as having no valid takings claim is a precedent for a similar view in other pending cases. I still maintain that this was the best course by which plaintiffs in the Perry proceeding could make inroads in the government's position, and now that appears to be unlikely based on the this and the earlier Lamberth ruling.

Awaiting Delaware amended complaint details. Should be very interesting and could be a gamechanger if my suspicions are validated.

JMHO.