![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, August 19, 2016 10:44:04 AM
BUt he had argued before that the Perry plaintiffs fuddied up the case by going after the APA and contract claim. He questioned the tactic saying that the takings argument had more merit.
We can now see the wisdom of the plaintiff attorneys. The Piezel appeal is saying that no taking has occured since he was able to bring the case to court. He coulve brought a direct claim in state court, for which the statute has run out.
oh what tangled circular logic govt weaves. They are trying to displace the plaintiff in the Paraglia v Fannie case by arguing that FHFA usurped all rights of the shareholders. That there is a taking. But in other cases, it claims that it did no such thing.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM