InvestorsHub Logo

Turtle65

07/29/16 2:19 AM

#67842 RE: PacificNW #67841

I agree Afford, I love Mav's posts, but half the time I don't understand what the hell he is talking about.....GLTA

maverick_1

07/29/16 3:01 AM

#67843 RE: PacificNW #67841

3AM EST: OK Afford et al re involve Woodford Funds in next equity raise or not?

1.My strong sense is that CEO LP would prefer IF she has other options to allow other institutional investors to get on board. The reasons are:
a)NW's major strategical misjudgments has cost CEO LP and us dearly.
b)Why do you think Chardan Capital would assent to an UNHEARD of paltry $3.7 mln direct placement???
Why didn't she continue with HC Wainwright?
Because of ALL the reasons I already specified!in previous posts.

SHOULD the next equity offering take place CEO LP may limit or possibly eliminate NW involvement IF there are other preferable alternatives. (that's where the expertise/recognition of Dr. Amusa comes into play!) ALL of that is highly speculative, but it is all logical and intelligent inference on my part!that few would even proffer a smidgen to.. let alone this whole highly complex enchilda here.

For all to ponder: with the entanglement mess brought on by NW since Nov 2015 that IMHO threw ALL of LP's plans really askew AND THE accompanying DEVASTATION of NWBO shs, CEO LP was put in a CRISIS MODE by NW! I can't see how anyone would think differently!

IMHO NW was outsmarted on two levels:
By the Manipulators to cast dispersions of doubt about NW's NWBO investment via lots of UK media channels to affect his shareholder base!
Secondly NW was outsmarted TWICE by LP: No CEO wants to be put in such a vise! but CEO LP dug deep and executed for the betterment of ALL:
1)better NEW Bd of Director and
2)better Investigator for Alleged Stock Price Manipulation
along with:
3)Highly credentialed Scientific Advisory Board

ALL of the above MAY BE LIKELY PRECLUDED by:
1) Long awaited Investigation by Ambassador Black could be one helluva of rocket booster to send shorts to cover
2) either one or three collaborations on CI front mentioned in the early May 2016 Press Release that IF it happens would catapult the shares to whatever level.


So if you follow ALL of the above, to me it appears far fetched logically to see NW's further involvement.

Clearly the above is highly complex and the timing and details are critical in how ALL of it unfolds.

IT"S OUT OF OUR HANDS!

sturmndrang555

07/29/16 10:16 AM

#67876 RE: PacificNW #67841

You should give yourself more credit--you often say what others are thinking but dare not post for fear of retribution.