InvestorsHub Logo

FD2you

06/24/16 3:47 PM

#36605 RE: BigBuy57 #36600

First, the auditor has no need to question the valuation that an expert determined. Does not matter if it was a simple valuation by sale price.

Second, the SEC has no reason to waste their time on the inflated valuation, because it was approved by an expert and signed off on by the auditor.

Third, it does not take much research to see that the valuation was inflated to instill a false feeling of value in the company. Many stinky pinky players don't care if the company is a scam and will gamble a trade just for the chance of a couple tick gain during the inevitable pump.

I would LOVE to be proven wrong about ESCU. Time will show their true intentions just as time proved Kimmons to be a useless piece of garbage that stole money from countless of investors while telling boldfaced lies directly to their faces.

GLTA

stockfan100

06/24/16 4:11 PM

#36612 RE: BigBuy57 #36600

That is the bottom line and that makes all speculations about the ESCU 40,000,000 asset ridiculous and distracting.

SEC has not questioned the integrity of the valuation.

FD2you

06/24/16 4:15 PM

#36614 RE: BigBuy57 #36600

"That is one good reason SEC does not bother to go through every single report they get from speculators! LOL"