Replies to post #36605 on Carnegie Development Inc. (CDJM)

[stockfan100]

LOL...Many times speculations were proven wrong about the Audit never would be done, the S-1 would never be filed, Kimmons make a killing, Kimmons would never return ALL of his shares, 40, 000,000 asset not good enough...and the list will continue even when ESCU is uplisted and the PPS is in double digits :)

The boring and outdate speculations about ESCU will never go away! :)

I would LOVE to be proven wrong about ESCU.

[BigBuy57]

Wrong. The auditor does ask questions about the valuation before it agrees to placing an asset on the balance sheet. First, is the valuation expert ACCREDITED. Auditors will only accept valuations performed by accredited valuation experts.

Second, did the valuation expert follow the generally accepted standards for making the appraisal? Valuation experts go to great lengths to describe the procedure they use for making the appraisal. That's because they know the auditor and regulatory agencies are going to be asking the appropriate questions. Remember, appraisers are only as good as their last appraisal. They can lose their license.

Regarding Kimmons, wrong again. He was exonerated by the audit and by federal filings. There was absolutely no theft of shareholder holdings. That's a fact.

[stockfan100]

Speculations are worthless to ESCU shareholders...Facts always work!

"...the company did not pay the Kimmons what was in the agreements because it did not have the money.

Like I already said, if Kimmons had received stock or cash he would have had to file the information with the SEC. Kimmons was not paid what he was owed.

In short,just because contracts were in place and reported does NOT mean that payment occurred.

This is easily determined by reviewing the audit."