Replies to post #36597 on Carnegie Development Inc. (CDJM)

[FD2you]

I believe the S-1 clearly states that the patent valuation was attained by the cost of sale method.

ESCU has been pretty transparent in their scamming, but are relying on useful idiots to make it appear legitimate.

That's a pretty smart method of promotion. I wonder how many shares it costs them for that? Would it be listed under "advertising" in the books?

[BigBuy57]

OK, so let's go with your proposition. If that's what the appraisal says, how did the valuation make it onto the ESCU balance sheet?

No auditor would stand behind it. They would never sign off.

Also, the SEC has not questioned the integrity of the valuation. If the valuation says what you are accusing it of saying there would certainly be questions.

So where exactly does this line of thinking take us?

Answer: nowhere