Replies to post #32412 on Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[1mort]

waste: "possibly give some of the settlement as a dividend to shareholders.
"

Guess you were not here for the other shareholder dividends - that are restricted and are more or less worthless. Let the company keep the $$$$ and use it wisely - then when they are a 10 billion firm - then we can discuss shareholder dividends - until then it is a total waste.

GLA

[Giovanni]

I only have one post per day.

How for goodness sake could you think this?

"But I was hoping for a large enough settlement that overfunded what they thought they needed to run the business where they could possibly give some of the settlement as a dividend to shareholders."

Can you give me one example of "a dividend to shareholders" by any corporation that received a huge settlement?

Thank you.

PS I cannot find ONE!

[diannedawn]

But I was hoping for a large enough settlement that overfunded what they thought they needed to run the business where they could possibly give some of the settlement as a dividend to shareholders.

expecting a dividend was very optimistic...

I am just trying to find a reasonable explanation for why;
if the settlement was really as large as some CLAIM,
that every cent needed to be stuck in a legal fund.

Something does not wash here.
Add to that the general lack of transparency that seems to have been the norm for awhile now
and things in KB's past....

It's a popular choice to believe that anyone who asks questions...
or brings up any subject that doesn't fit with the "To The Moon" rhetoric
must be short or working for someone (I believe you suggested JnJ).
I can't speak for everyone, but both miss the mark for me.