InvestorsHub Logo

ItsMyOption

05/16/16 4:12 PM

#8122 RE: goldcanyon341 #8121

Yes, saw that goldcanyon341 everything I see I cannot see anyway that some dishonest judge from Delaware could approval the JPM motion.

The motion should get denied, or it will have an easy win on appeal. JPM has put the Judge in a bad spot and she will not be happy!

ItsMyOption

05/17/16 9:59 AM

#8123 RE: goldcanyon341 #8121

can anyone explain how one can cut and past from IHUB and edit it in Word to remove the highlighting that it give?

linda1

05/17/16 10:51 AM

#8125 RE: goldcanyon341 #8121

Thanks - I heard that too when I listened
to the Hearing and will be including it in my
objection.





linda1

05/17/16 10:59 AM

#8127 RE: goldcanyon341 #8121

The [unintelligible - 00:21:11] is
" collateral estoppel " and should read
as follows:


JUDGE: Okay. Mr. Fountain [Atty for JPMorgan Chase].
Can I ask the same question of you that I
just asked Mr. Todor, whether there would be
any collateral estoppel or claim preclusion
argument made or makeable in a separate action
against whoever ends up winning in the Court of
Federal Claims on the question of who owns the
cause of action?