The [unintelligible - 00:21:11] is " collateral estoppel " and should read as follows:
JUDGE: Okay. Mr. Fountain [Atty for JPMorgan Chase]. Can I ask the same question of you that I just asked Mr. Todor, whether there would be any collateral estoppel or claim preclusion argument made or makeable in a separate action against whoever ends up winning in the Court of Federal Claims on the question of who owns the cause of action?