InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,174.00
(
1.14%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.17
(
-0.02%
)
Bitcoin
61,788.55
(
-0.02%
)
Post# of 8307
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

linda1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 75
Posts 9397
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2008

linda1

Re: goldcanyon341 post# 8121

Tuesday, 05/17/2016 10:59:11 AM

Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:59:11 AM

Post# of 8307
The [unintelligible - 00:21:11] is
" collateral estoppel " and should read
as follows:


JUDGE: Okay. Mr. Fountain [Atty for JPMorgan Chase].
Can I ask the same question of you that I
just asked Mr. Todor, whether there would be
any collateral estoppel or claim preclusion
argument made or makeable in a separate action
against whoever ends up winning in the Court of
Federal Claims on the question of who owns the
cause of action?



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up