InvestorsHub Logo

ItsMyOption

05/17/16 12:33 PM

#8129 RE: linda1 #8127

Linda, that great you where able to pick out what was first unintelligible. Is that word for word as recorded?

The [unintelligible - 00:21:11] is
" collateral estoppel " and should read
as follows:


JUDGE: Okay. Mr. Fountain [Atty for JPMorgan Chase].
Can I ask the same question of you that I
just asked Mr. Todor, whether there would be
any collateral estoppel or claim preclusion
argument made or makeable in a separate action
against whoever ends up winning in the Court of
Federal Claims on the question of who owns the
cause of action?