Replies to post #28740 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[skidoo31]

All this has been PR'd already, this doesn't exclude Cowans attorney from making any other offers !!!
The legal teams may have not come to an IMMEDIATE agreement, therefore this doesn't automatically mean this will drag on for 18 months.... OH DEAR LMAO....

Who's to say Cowans insurance won't make another offer? Sounds like the company and Seth have a very strong case, the longer this drags out the more damages incurred...

Kind of like that chess game huh? Your move Cowan, pay up or go in front of a jury as guilty as you are ;)

[diannedawn]

Really???
THIS information ...that the negotiations fell through, and they were proceeding with litigation...

"("Tauriga") a Florida corporation, by and through its undersigned attorneys and files this Status Report, and does state:
1. The parties actively participated in mediation.
2. The parties are unable to resolve the matter at this time and will be proceeding with litigation.
3. Defendants have not been served, but a request has been made for counsel to accept service. If service is not accepted in the next week, we will proceed with service of process and notify the Court of the date of service"

From the docket...dated 3/11...
03/11/2016 16 STATUS REPORT by Tauriga Sciences, Inc. (Silverberg, Paul) (Entered: 03/11/2016)

was "put out and communicated to ALL"???
WHERE???
No 8K filed
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001142790&owner=exclude&start=0&count=40
There has not been 8k since October 2015...

And No PR since the March 8th one, a few days prior to the court Status Report filing.
It did not say that at all...
it said
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-obtains-audit-130000924.html
"The Company is currently in discussions with several potential acquisition targets, all of whom would require Tauriga to regain its status as a fully reporting entity with the SEC. The Company has not ruled out the possibility of entering into a binding agreement with a potential acquisition target; however one critical condition must be met. Tauriga's Board of Directors has mandated that any such binding agreement must incorporate a closing period clause of "up to 500 calendar days." This should provide Tauriga with sufficient time to complete the prosecution of its lawsuit against Cowan Gunteski, which was filed on November 4, 2015 in Federal District Court in the Southern District Florida. The Company is confident in its ability to win a substantial monetary award should the case not settle prior to the commencement of such trial."

So...PLEASE...DO enlighten us ALL...
WHERE was this information "put out"???

I'll wait right here.
ROTFLMAO