InvestorsHub Logo

drivepact

03/13/16 4:59 PM

#17044 RE: brentkosta #17043

Didn't realize it was common knowledge. Been with them for 2yrs great product everytime.
Not sure where you got the 90% of diverted patients.
CGC has more then one brand.
Why is Supreme going to grow a superior product that would have people switching to them or signing with them (which could end up being an entirely different process in 5 months). People won't switch unless the product is better. I want to know why they will grow a superior product and how you know that. It's mj, it's not rocket science and it truly is not a difficult plant to grow. On a 40,000sqft level it takes a lot more logistics, but it's a plant.

free bird

03/13/16 6:28 PM

#17047 RE: brentkosta #17043

They have 15,000 customers on paper and only 1500 actually buy from them?
Wow... Do you have links? What you are saying is common knowledge makes me feel real dumb for not knowing. So maybe with the links you can get me and the rest of board up to speed.
TIA
GL to all here.

apostrophe

03/13/16 8:42 PM

#17052 RE: brentkosta #17043

re: "Because it's common knowledge that Tweed has a pathetic product. "

It is not. A few disgruntled MMAR growers have a negative propaganda campaign going on in a desperate attempt to protect their profits, but genuine customers are very pleased with the quality. I'm also seeing former skeptics being won over after they reported trying cgc.

CGC has a different business model than Supreme geared to maximum expansion and acquisitions. They're going to market premium product and branding in the rec market while retaining med mj through bed but all that re-investment is going to weigh on the share price for a while. When they've figured that they've got a big enough footprint and ease off on expansion, then we'll likely see a blue-chip evaluation for cgc.

Supreme is more internally focused, low burn rate, no immediate plans for global domination. They have the potential to be a powerhouse in the good-quality, good price, and also largest sector of the rec market. They will come into a solid valuation much sooner than cgc, but both companies are good in their own way, With both, one can have most of the bases covered. imo