InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

righton21

02/28/16 1:10 PM

#42925 RE: Dolph340 #42923

Re: "How do you know it's the same formula?"

Admittedly, I don't. But I believe someone posted a long time back that SA & JS stole the distributor/rancher that IFUS had cultivated long before and told them that "IFUS was going to go bankrupt" and "just buy the stuff from us because it is the same thing." I can't find the post and could be mistaken but I thought I had read that a year or two ago. I guess one could also make the assumption that since SA & JS opened up for business 2 days after being kicked off the board that they didn't have a lot of time to experiment with new formulations of the product before beginning to sell it so they just sold the same thing.

I'm content with leaving the courts decide. If the boot boys can prove that they were selling a different product and different formulation, then so be it. But I think they will have a lot of trouble proving that fact since what they were selling is apparently still in existence somewhere and can be analyzed as to it's content and formulation.
icon url

Darth Trader

02/28/16 1:38 PM

#42927 RE: Dolph340 #42923

They're using the same studies they stole and fraudulently presented as their own and got caught at it.
icon url

pantherj

02/28/16 9:14 PM

#42930 RE: Dolph340 #42923

That's very interesting ... since IFUS never, at any time, had a precise formula. In fact, one of the entries on the company's Farcbook page recounted how the formula would have to be adjusted because it caused bricking, "probably because there was to much mastic." Those comments were made by IFUS own people ... and they were made MONTHS after Mr. Adelstein and Mr. Scivoletto were gone.

Obviously, one cannot steal what does not exist and no formula ever existed, at least not one that produced satisfactory results. On top of that, IFUS abandoned the patent.

All these loopy allegations will be thrown out of court ... just as they already have been in the Federal case.