Replies to post #41791 on Calissio Resources Group Inc (CRGP)

[Entangled Proton]

This counts as a doc too.

To:Cc:Bcc:Subject:Cor?clearing?vs?calissio?resources?group?incFrom:casey?zimmerman?<[e-mail]>To:[e-mail]:11/09/2015?03:43?PMSubject:Cor?clearing?vs?calissio?resources?group?inc

Dear Honorable Judge Strom, In response to Cor Clearing and Mike Hilger, stated a dividend was paid at $0.011 and used example $1,500 investment at $0.0015 price per share would turn into $11,000 just days later. They are correct except for the fact when Calissio Resources announced the dividend, the price per share at that time was well over $0.011. The market is volatile and nobody knew the price would drop drastically. Cor clearing continuously keeps leaving out valuable facts in there documents. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Casey Zimmerman

http://www.scribd.com/doc/289249726/COR-Clearing-LLC-v-Calissio-Resources-Group-Inc-Et-Al-Doc-75-Filed-09-Nov-15

[halbaag]

This just looks desperate on the part of COR clearing. Clawing at anything to get someone to pay them back for their own complacency in the face of a shrewder foe.

Much like the entire receiver debacle. They will eat this loss in its entirety. Calling it now.

$CRGP

[DiscoveryStock]

COR's like a fly bumping on a window_looking_for_a_way_out. That response has holes in almost every line. No wonder why the other lawyer team just walked away.

[janice shell]

Interesting…

Moreover, Signature’s suggestion that DTCC should have been named a defendant lacks merit. Mot. at 2, 4. Although the Complaint alleges weaknesses in DTCC’s system, the Complaint further describes how Signature and the other Defendants took advantage of those weaknesses to collect dividends they were not entitled to receive. See Compl. ¶¶ 1, 31. In other words, the alleged weakness in DTCC’s system simply provides background for COR Clearing’s claims against Signature and the other Defendants.

That's not a statement with which I entirely concur. There's some other reason COR doesn't want to provoke DTCC.

If DTCC's system was so flawed that it allowed this to happen, then I should think DTCC could be considered liable.