while i agree that Mark technically has a decent case, given the recorded evidence, in which both BMAS and Mark's lawyer were involved directly.
but suing the govt can be a significant endeavor, requiring significant resources.
per call, Mark is discussing options with the lawyer who got the MIKP chills removed previously.
first step would be that lawyer feeling the case is winnable, and worth pursuing.
next step would be funding the pursuit of the case.
given Mark's lack of significant capital,
the lawyer would probably need to sue for both damages/reinstatement and legal fee compensation.
let's see what the lawyer says...