REVO doesn't have an NDA with any of the defendant companies, because REVO was not the plaintiff, and was not a party to any of the settlements. That suggests they're hiding behind an NDA with Eyetalk365
This was a big part of the SEC's beef:
But, REVO cannot use an NDA to hide income. It must account for all income due from, or to, Eyetalk365.
Could you imagine if a real company did this? Poor business. They saw right through this charade