InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,267.84
(
-0.74%
)
US TECH 100
18,150.00
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,065.26
(
-1.53%
)
Brent Oil
81.18
(
-0.16%
)
Bitcoin
67,436.05
(
-0.72%
)
Post# of 68825
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

SamuraiAnimated

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 20
Posts 978
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2014

SamuraiAnimated

Re: Krysti post# 61245

Thursday, 07/30/2015 9:45:29 AM

Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:45:29 AM

Post# of 68825
Spot on Krysti

REVO doesn't have an NDA with any of the defendant companies, because REVO was not the plaintiff, and was not a party to any of the settlements. That suggests they're hiding behind an NDA with Eyetalk365



This was a big part of the SEC's beef:

But, REVO cannot use an NDA to hide income. It must account for all income due from, or to, Eyetalk365.



Could you imagine if a real company did this? Poor business. They saw right through this charade
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up