You're correct, Sumdude, the NDA is pretty ineffective.
REVO doesn't have an NDA with any of the defendant companies, because REVO was not the plaintiff, and was not a party to any of the settlements. That suggests they're hiding behind an NDA with Eyetalk365.
But, REVO cannot use an NDA to hide income. It must account for all income due from, or to, Eyetalk365.
REVO financials, if accurate, would immediately reveal the value of any settlements obtained by Eyetalk365.
It would be in REVO's best interests to file those accounts IF the settlements were valuable ... So, their refusal to file them speaks volumes.
