Replies to post #72193 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[gorgol]

Very strange about the Turing phone. EVen stranger if its true. But it got the words "liquid metal"
out again.....and that's good.

I agree about Steipp. But he made one big blunder. That pay raise. That was wrong in so many ways.
Which made me a sceptic. That's what blunders like that do. Also the MA error. Another blunder
just when they're trying to build a reputation. I hope there are no more blunders of that degree.

[miketomm]

I agree. I don't know what the process is for either having your name pulled from a fraudulent press release, but my point is that there was a lot of mention of his name back in April. You'd think that if he didn't know of his name being used, others would have alerted him. So, 2-1/2 months later, if they were warned not to use his name before, they are dragging it through the muck with not a care about destroying the man's reputation or fear of being sued for doing so. He's got that blog. He posted about LQMT and Apple on there. He actually sounded pretty bitter on that blog. You'd think he'd use some method to clear his name of this "Turing" phone and dispel the myth of it. And yes it is much better and civil. GL.

[sparky99]

I don't understand this type of comment:

I believe Steipp has done an incredible job with Liquidmetal to-date and he's the right CEO to make Liquidmetal a great success.

Even if we think the company might be finally positioned correctly, how can his prior blunders be overlooked? Look at the share dilution under his direction; look at the stops and starts in terms of LQMT direction under his direction; look at his allowance of non-communication with shareholders under his direction; look at his pay raise attempt under his direction; look at the PPS under his direction; look at the deal with Visser under his direction; look at the current staff under his direction.

You guys can call me a negative naysayer and that I am looking at the past, but that stuff simply don't lie - and it's all verifiable with a little research.

Even if the company is now positioned correctly, I'd still like him out and want someone else more capable and trustworthy in his spot.