He believes that the reason UC cannot say anything to the shareholders at the moment is because UC's attorneys are wanting him to clear some things up with the SEC.
"3) He receives calls almost everyday from a brokerage house who is having issues with not being able to find shares to cert. "
thats because the mullets are lying to frizzie, in hopes of padding the numbers to satisfy their lunatic NSS agenda. If the shares aren't in their account, it's because they never bought them
I can't take anything Frizzy says at face value. The instant he signed the non-disclosure agreement he ceased representing the shareholders nad became just another lackey for UC.
As for point #2, I think UC's own lawyers have his mouth taped shut as far as any communication with shareholders. Can't blame them.
As for point #3, I would love to see documented evidence to back that claim. I don't think he has it (evidence). I don't think he will ever have it.