InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

famulus

06/06/06 9:33 PM

#210180 RE: uwlungman #210179

Lungman-did frizzy also tell you he was FOS?
icon url

janice shell

06/06/06 9:35 PM

#210181 RE: uwlungman #210179

Oh for God's sake.

He believes that the reason UC cannot say anything to the shareholders at the moment is because UC's attorneys are wanting him to clear some things up with the SEC.

That, I suspect, is a gross understatement.

I'm liking Frizzy less and less.
icon url

BuzzOnDaBeach

06/06/06 10:35 PM

#210184 RE: uwlungman #210179

Yes, stringing along the gulliblers so the bad guys can escape cleanly. That's a wonderful thing to be proud of.

Buzz
icon url

nostinkinc

06/06/06 11:15 PM

#210194 RE: uwlungman #210179

LOL
icon url

hasher

06/06/06 11:21 PM

#210195 RE: uwlungman #210179

"3) He receives calls almost everyday from a brokerage house who is having issues with not being able to find shares to cert. "

thats because the mullets are lying to frizzie, in hopes of padding the numbers to satisfy their lunatic NSS agenda. If the shares aren't in their account, it's because they never bought them
icon url

pantherj

06/07/06 2:51 AM

#210226 RE: uwlungman #210179

I can't take anything Frizzy says at face value. The instant he signed the non-disclosure agreement he ceased representing the shareholders nad became just another lackey for UC.

As for point #2, I think UC's own lawyers have his mouth taped shut as far as any communication with shareholders. Can't blame them.

As for point #3, I would love to see documented evidence to back that claim. I don't think he has it (evidence). I don't think he will ever have it.