Replies to post #413853 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[bkshadow]

Really found evidence of more than that...

...there appears not be an understanding of the parties (even in the totally separate Receivership and the P&AA) in the bankruptcy and the differences between them:

~ WMI (the debtor in bankruptcy and now wrapping up in the WMILT) and

~ WMB (the banking subsidiary, and all of its subsidiaries including the ones that securitized this particular SERIES 2006 AR6 which is one of the MBS purchased by the Boilermakers and is included in their litigation in bankruptcy court when they alleged WMI was parent of WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp.; it was not, WMB was and they were rebuked).

...that is then made more consequential when taking bits and pieces (such as the MBS "sold" by WMB and its subsidiaries to "investors who own them") that are misunderstood as assets of WMI that are hidden.

Your concise reply is totally correct. However, I don't know if it will be accepted. So, an assist.

1. SEC Filing - Series 2006 AR6

Note that Washington Mutual, Inc. is not a party.



2. BOILERMAKERS Litigation Reference - Series 2006 AR6

Note, they OWN them and are litigating based on their ownership of them; i.e., they are not at the Receivership OR WMI/WMILT/WMIH.




3. BOILERMAKERS Litigation Alleged WMI was the Parent of WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp.




It was not.