InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ziploc_1

06/13/03 4:24 PM

#32587 RE: JimLur #32579

Jimlur,Your reasoning is difficult to agree with. Ronnie stated:"..."I do know for a fact that in a number of cases this selling by so may of our senior executives has given the company a very negative prospective from the Wall Street Community. At a minimum, this selling has given the appearance of an 'immaturity' by our management".
You state "Somebody certainly found a way to interest Frank and the institutions so in my book I have to give credit to management on that issue."
How about the three or four additional institutions that might have covered IDCC but for the heavy insider trading. IMO your comment does not come close to refuting what I consider an important point made by Ronnie.
icon url

Menander

06/13/03 5:43 PM

#32596 RE: JimLur #32579

Jim....What you state is certainly true: Management should receive credit for the coverage by Frank Marsala and the increase in institutional ownership.
But, in all fairness, I think the following is equally true:
The IDCC insider selling is a negative. It earned a less than positive DJI newswire recently. Also,this past Monday my broker brought Campagna's sale to my attention, pointing out to me that the sale was not well-perceived, based on the small number of shares Campagna owns (forget options).
Institutional ownership, while slightly over 30%, is still nowhere near the level enjoyed by many, if not most, other respectable companies. And it has taken a good while to even get to this point.
Analyst coverage has certainly improved. But IDCC still does not have any of the premier coverage it deserves and, I expect, it will eventually receive.
So, bottom line, progress has been made, which has helped significantly. But this is certainly not the time to sit back and overly congratulate a management who continues a practice of significant, ongoing selling, coupled with a continuing low-ownership base. I am referring, of course, to actual ownership of shares, not ownership of options. This situation does not reflect management confidence in the company. Ownership of options does not require one to pony up any money.
One is left with the sense that this management does not understand Wall Street and the investing public, and because of that they are hurting the share price.