InvestorsHub Logo

Along4theRide

01/26/15 4:32 PM

#203991 RE: InternetForumUser #203989

Can't disagree... I read this and don't think it's a coincidence. I'm not going to lie, I actually have a knot in my stomach right now.

revenue_monster

01/26/15 4:39 PM

#203995 RE: InternetForumUser #203989

Yes. "Devorce" and Steve no look so good" and "lots of employees no like him" Must be the staff at his mansion posting.

Jeff4iam4

01/26/15 4:59 PM

#203998 RE: InternetForumUser #203989

If you pick and choose his posts, it almost makes you think he may be credible...almost as if he might work for PPHM. However, if you read all his posts, it really starts to look more like a blathering idiot who takes shots in the dark and acts as if he knows stuff. Anyone can find out about someone in a divorce proceeding. There are people who do basic research and use information gleened to present themselves as in the know things when they really do not. If i were you guys getting taken in by this shuckster, be careful...the chances of him actually knowing anything is pretty remote. As CP eluded to over the weekend...in not so many words and not actually quoting him...there will likely be an all out effort to extract shares from longs as we inch closer to the finish line. This smells very much along those lines. It could also just be a rogue short who has played this stock for several years and this is his latest attempt to drop the price do he can cover for a nice profit. I see absolutely no reason why the FDA would be sending letters to PPHM that would say they are out of line. The FDA approved their trial design and unless the contracted 3rd party isn't doing the trial correctly, why would the FDA get involved now? Wouldn't there have to be a look-in before they would comment? My understanding is a look in isn't supposed to happen until next month or March at the earliest. Something drinks here and it doesn't appear to be coming from PPHM.

Protector

01/26/15 5:29 PM

#204002 RE: InternetForumUser #203989

ITF, he was not the only one that knew about SK's divorce.

BTW, his divorce is settled and his ex even has PPHM shares now.
And as far as I know SK isn't in jail or has even been close (for a divorce). So far for that theatre performance.

And what is the posters handle/screen name. If he posts on a public board (because this looks like YMB) and his name is visible there then there is no need to hide it here UNLESS it is an attempt in avoiding that this message would be put under scrutiny. We don't even hide the handles or names from AF, PC, DD, or from other YMB posters if we reference them or copy their messages.

And if you work 13 years in the US with PPHM (That is since 2002 then) and you can't write English that could compete with mine, then I doubt it that you are privy to the content of FDA letters.
If the guy is so worried and find PPHM such lie-tellers then why is he still there!