If you pick and choose his posts, it almost makes you think he may be credible...almost as if he might work for PPHM. However, if you read all his posts, it really starts to look more like a blathering idiot who takes shots in the dark and acts as if he knows stuff. Anyone can find out about someone in a divorce proceeding. There are people who do basic research and use information gleened to present themselves as in the know things when they really do not. If i were you guys getting taken in by this shuckster, be careful...the chances of him actually knowing anything is pretty remote. As CP eluded to over the weekend...in not so many words and not actually quoting him...there will likely be an all out effort to extract shares from longs as we inch closer to the finish line. This smells very much along those lines. It could also just be a rogue short who has played this stock for several years and this is his latest attempt to drop the price do he can cover for a nice profit. I see absolutely no reason why the FDA would be sending letters to PPHM that would say they are out of line. The FDA approved their trial design and unless the contracted 3rd party isn't doing the trial correctly, why would the FDA get involved now? Wouldn't there have to be a look-in before they would comment? My understanding is a look in isn't supposed to happen until next month or March at the earliest. Something drinks here and it doesn't appear to be coming from PPHM.
