Replies to post #203998 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Jeff4iam4]

Small correction ....."something stinks here". Not " something drinks here". Stupid spell check on my cell phone....i mean, really? A spell checker changes stinks to drinks? Like stinks is not an actual word? And it is still doing it. I think my phone drinks....or is on drugs. Maybe if i slap it around a little, maybe that will fix it.

[InternetForumUser]

Yes.. but the only reason I chose those posts were because I felt they were fairly accurate for a blubbering fool.

How about that date of September 7?.. that is freakishly accurate. No one and I mean no one here has come anywhere near that sort of prediction.

Did he just come up with that date out of thin air?

As for the FDA Comment.. I have no idea what he/she was blabbering about. I have no idea what is meant by "inline with approval".

[Protector]

jeff4iam4, an FDA letter for a biotech company is a material event, just as is a SEC letter for a listed company. PPHM is listed hence...

Now, PPHM is of course under no obligation to tell us about every single letters that does not impact the investment, such as a meeting scheduling or so. But if the FDA would communicate something to PPHM that would have consequences as described in those messages (the 'total collapse' doom) then they have 4 days to tell us. So as the FDA will not write TWO letters the same day, we would have know already.

But actually all that is nonsense for another reason:
We have NO BUSINESS with the FDA ones the trial is started according the design and FDA rules & guidelines. This is a DOUBLE BLINDED trial, remember. PPHM hands it over in a kick-off. After that it is the CRO running the show and the data monitoring committee oversee the data.

If this is coded language then this could well mean the EXACT OPPOSITE. PPHM received letter from the FDA that holds content that would make the PPS explode. With the early look-ins that the FDA granted us that would have least have some grounds!