Replies to post #27162 on Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[GetSeriousOK]

underdawg, you said:

"What you will seeis a RCE filed including the patent along with the Provista Diagnostics biomarkers..."

That is Nonsense, my good fellow. They can't file a RCE and change the patent application that drastically. You are describing an entirely new patent application.

And why would they do that? You said in post 27114:

"The patents are in the hands of William Gartner and Provista Diagnostics. His patent attorney is located in Phoenix. DR-70 along with Provista's biomarkers are included in those patents.."

So why bother with Radient's rejected patent application?

With Dr. Small gone, nobody knows the case well enough to argue a RCE anyway, IMO. Radient never had many doctors - mostly they had salespeople and marketing people.

[Gold Seeker]

Underdawg, It does not matter who the patent application was assigned to. Ms. Howard is the only one who knows enough about the application to be able to respond.

It is also a foolish statement to say other claims can be added to an application. All you can do is remove claims or explain how the examiner is incorrect in the denial of a claim.

You might as well admit that the application is DEAD and GONE. No one is going to attempt to get it reinstated nor is anyone going to respond to the claim denials.

Again, please state what you dream to be Radient assets that would be a positive in any kind of merger.

Radient has one asset left, CIT and Radient has already declared it to have no value.

Radient is no longer any type of shell because it no longer has public tradable shares.

What is left....NOTHING.